Record and mouth off about the advantages and disadvantages of city life and country life

Where would you prefer to live in the city or in the land?

If I could choose where to live I would have the best of some places as each of them has its own advantages to say nothing of disadvantages.

What are the advantages of absolute in the redbrick urban center?

Life in the urban center is much easier than in the country – developed deligh system, sewerage organization, information, sports, shopping malls, etc. Modern men are too sophisticated for sword-shaped country pleasures. There is right more entertainment in the city than in the country. Cities propose high concentration of good things in life: big stores, restaurants, theatres, cinemas, art galleries. Life is more convenient in a city: services are always amend Here. In the city people are more open-minded. It is potential to date, pretend friends and ne'er be amputate from them by windward conditions. Generally, people do not head what you exercise in the city. In City of London people have more than chances to be exploited, as the range of jobs is greater than in a village. Besides in the city people have more chances to succeed. Moreover, life is ne'er dull in the city, people e'er have something to do here. The objections to metropolis bread and butter are not convincing enough. People easily adapt to various inconveniences of city life. For exercise, noise and traffic are just noticeable to city-dwellers. In the city particularly in our country people sleep in apartments with central warming, telephone, gas, electrical energy, receiving set, TV and the Internet. Just about people love cities. In 330 BC Aristotle wrote that by nature man belonged to a urban center. Many a people love the busy city life. Information technology is enough for them to chew the fat a country at weekends.

What brought most the growth of cities over the centuries?

Cities grew over the centuries because they served aims that could not have been served otherwise. Deuce thousand days ago most people lived in the countryside. It was not their choice. Today, almost half of humanity lives in cities. It does indeed because it wants to. Man has always lived in groups. IT makes life safer and easier. Geography – well-fixed soil, a innocuous harbour operating theater navigable river, good refreshful water, cushy defense lawyers, ember – was the start of some towns. In Europe towns grew over the strongholds of a topical anaestheti lord. Most of them improved as buying and selling centres; trade needed a commercialise, and markets necessary people.

How did towns serve their inhabitants?

Towns served their citizens very well if they in turn were served by them. During the Middle Ages when harvest failed, the close township offered hope of survival. All successful towns satisfied economical of necessity. For a peasant town was the solitary put down where He might make a fortune. In the new developed order, the City was the centre, brining to a focus completely dynamic economic forces: vast accumulation of capital, business and financial institutions, spreading railroad yards, factories, and armies of manual and clerical workers. For example, in the USA villages, attracting people from the countryside and from the land across the seas, grew into towns and towns into cities almost overnight.

Are on that point any disadvantages of living in City of London?

Pollution is the greatest disfavour of the city life sentence of today. Contaminated air is hanging like a brown mottle ended cities. Dirt and fume are pouring from the buildings of cites and factories. Polluted urbanized air causes metastasis distress, particularly in children, and elderly people. The increased number of efferent vehicles not only muddle the city streets but pollute the city air also. Cars give a collection of pollutants. In bright, calm weather condition, sunlight turns the chemicals into a envenom smogginess. All big cities take over problems with air pollution. There was still nothing anywhere like "killer-smog" which caused some 3000-4000 deaths in London in December 1952. Mexico city's aviation is famously filthy, as is that of many Indian, Chinese, and East European cities. The exceeding output of industries and urban communities is stabbing to the city aquatic systems. The result is a foul-smelling body of water running for a bath operating room dish washing. Sound pollution is the job of big cities too. Citified garbage – like intellectual nourishment, report, and cans – on the basis or in the street is one more problem of cities. People assume't always put their garbage in the ash-bin. Urban garbage is ugly. It makes the urban center look for faecal, and it spoils the view.

What are some other disadvantages of living in a big metropolis?

There are dozens of other disadvantages of living in a vauntingly city. Today's cities are ballooning. Bombay in 1960 was a jam-packed urban center of 4m people. Now Mexico city holds around 18m multitude. "The belt along-hour" with thronged streets, packed trains, whole buses that happens twice a day is one of them. Cost of living is real high in the cities. Additionally, people live under constant threat; life is non soft in the cities, it causes stresses and substance disease. In the urban center people turn a loss touch with land, rhythms of nature. Everyone WHO cares around his health tries to go up out from the city. Cities are not fit to live in, humans are born for countryside. Most masses in Europe and America endeavor to live in non-industrialised cities, which are set belt down near big cities and can not be killed by befoulment and traffic.

Do you like to stay in the countryside?

Yes, I do. I like to stay in the countryside.

Why do you like to bide in the countryside?

Well, in the countryside I relish such simple things of primary grandness American Samoa sun and fresh air. Besides, people in the countryside is cheaper and safer than in a metropolis. It provides people with much security. There is less law-breaking and, of course, there is less traffic on that point. Life in the countryside is quiet, peaceful, and sound. I like to be close to nature. Hera multitude are gracious and it is much more pleasurable in the countryside than in the city. Unfortunately, life in the countryside is rather hard. Working and living conditions are difficult, social and cultural life in the countryside is non full of amusement. And annually increasingly young people flee from the countryside for a break life in the City.

Is it difficult to get hold a job in the countryside?

Sure enough, the problem of employ in the countryside is very determinant today. It is especially acute for the young people and professionals. As a rule at that place are few labour places for skilled agricultural workers and less for professionals. Although villages do need teachers and physicians, they fundament non provide them with the necessity facilities. There are some schools and clinics in the countryside. Sometimes on that point is incomparable secondary shoal for respective villages and children have to walk ten kilometres to study there. Usually either the village community is too poor to cater the children with a bus or the roads are too bad for the bus to bolt them.

Can this problem be solved?

Sure enough, people should always represent optimists and hope for a better animation. Where there is a will on that point is a way. Today we can witness the revitalisation of some villages. Til now they are few but annually their list is increasing.